| Click here to select a new forum. |
| Dvorak Keyboard Layout |
Posted by: MultiFinder on 2007-05-05 20:28:16
If any of you out there use a Dvorak keyboard, I'd like to announce that I have just joined your ranks. It's rather slow going right now, but I am already picking it up faster than I did QWERTY. Also, since you can have my Apple Pro Keyboard when you pry it from my cold, dead hands, I decided to rearrange my keyboard:
http://img130.imageshack.us/img130/4480/im000679lc0.jpg
Just a happy announcement!
|
Posted by: iMac600 on 2007-05-06 02:12:21
I've always wondered what Dvorak typing would be like. I'll have to give it a try some time.
Sounds like it's working out for the better though. 😀
|
Posted by: IPNixon on 2007-05-06 05:19:07
I might try learning it on my IIc...I'm not using it for anything else.
It'd be awesome of Dvorak laid the first 5 letters out like DVORAK...then, when he'd type his last name, he'd just have to swipe his finger across the first 5 keys 😀
Heheheheheheeheheheheeheheheheheeheehe...heh.
|
Posted by: joshc on 2007-05-06 11:50:20
Useless though, because DVORAK is slower than QWERTY.
|
Posted by: Torbar on 2007-05-06 12:15:44
I also just recently switched on my desktop using my IBM clickey keyboard
|
Posted by: IPNixon on 2007-05-06 13:41:21
I also just recently switched on my desktop using my IBM clickey keyboard I'm gonna be doing that, too!
Just waiting for my AT - PS/2 and PS/2 - USB adapters to arrive 😀
|
Posted by: heebiejeebies on 2007-05-07 18:45:48
Welcome aboard! We've been expecting you. You sticking with it? I'm surprised there aren't more of us actually; I thought being a Mac user was all about thinking different. If you've stuck with it you'll soon notice how much more smoothly and easily you type.
The only problem is, I would quite like to buy a typewriter - at least with a typewriter you get more than 5 minutes to compose your sonnet before the battery dies!! -but sadly they don't make Dvorak typewriters. Only Tchaikovsky tea-chests.
Useless though, because DVORAK is slower than QWERTY. Indeed. And my knee is Archbishop of Canterbury.
|
Posted by: MultiFinder on 2007-05-07 20:02:36
Welcome aboard! We've been expecting you. You sticking with it? I'm surprised there aren't more of us actually; I thought being a Mac user was all about thinking different. If you've stuck with it you'll soon notice how much more smoothly and easily you type. I decided that 1 week before school ends with 2357614687 reports that need to be typed probably wasn't the best time to learn a new keyboard layout 😛
However, I will be learning it over the summer and sticking with it. Good to find another here.
Wewt for the world record typing speed (212 WPM) being set on a Dvorak Keyboard!
|
Posted by: Patrickool93 on 2007-05-07 20:15:44
Neither is faster, it depends on the users knowledge of the layout and personal finger-speed.
|
Posted by: Kallikak on 2007-05-07 20:18:54
Wewt for the world record typing speed (212 WPM) being set on a Dvorak Keyboard! I'd credit the typist more than the keyboard for such a feat. 🙂
|
Posted by: heebiejeebies on 2007-05-07 20:22:41
Of course, but having an easier, more logical layout makes higher speeds possible; and I would imagine an average typist would probably improve their speed somewhat by switching. Once you've gotten used to Dvorak, then you try QWERTY again, you'll really feel like your fingers are playing a game of Twister on your keyboard.
|
Posted by: MultiFinder on 2007-05-07 21:06:02
Of course, but having an easier, more logical layout makes higher speeds possible; and I would imagine an average typist would probably improve their speed somewhat by switching. Once you've gotten used to Dvorak, then you try QWERTY again, you'll really feel like your fingers are playing a game of Twister on your keyboard. In the couple of days that I was using it there, I was amazed at just how little my fingers moved! It's nice really.
|
Posted by: Applemeister on 2007-05-11 15:10:00
I think it'd be too much re-adjustment for me to learn the Dvorak layout. I like impressing my friends by touch typing passwords using the standard QWERTY layout ;D
|
Posted by: The Macster on 2007-05-11 16:45:52
I think it'd be too much re-adjustment for me to learn the Dvorak layout. Same - I can't touch-type, but you do still feel your fingers moving towards the location of the keys you need without having to think about it. I don't think I could cope with trying to learn a new layout (plus you'd have to buy a special keyboard to even try it).
|
Posted by: Quadraman on 2007-05-11 18:29:12
After decades of teaching myself to use a keyboard with a decent amount of speed, changing to Dvorak would really screw me up.
|
Posted by: II2II on 2007-05-11 18:50:08
Two reasons why I won't touch a Dvorak layout:
1. I'm already a decent QWERTY touch typist. Since both keyboards use the same physical arrangement, knowing two key layouts would bugger me up. (I once tried Dvorak on an ergonomic keyboard. It ended up that I couldn't use QWERTY on that keyboard if I tried because of my mind jumbling them up.)
2. Everyone uses QWERTY anyway. Using Dvorak would either mean carting my own keyboard around, or finding somebody with administrative access to change the keymap.
|
Posted by: bluekatt on 2007-05-11 20:13:37
Useless though, because DVORAK is slower than QWERTY. really now ? then you dont know that qwerty was created to actually slow typists down
when they stil had old fashioned mechnical typewriters remember those ?
typists would be so fast the key hammers got tangled up qwerty was tought up to slow them down
these days its fast because we are used to it
the dvorak layout was created to be much more effecient and faster when you get used to it
i tried to get used to it but failed i have been using qwety longer then i care to remember
|
Posted by: II2II on 2007-05-11 21:34:17
you don't know that qwerty was created to actually slow typists down That is almost certainly an urban myth. The QWERTY keyboard was designed to minimize the number of collisions between hammers. Anyone who has actually used a mechanical typewriter will tell you that the hammers that tend to jam are the ones that are closest together. I'm guessing because there is a bigger region where the hammers try to occupy the same spot since they are running along roughly the same line. Anyway, the point is you reduce the collisions by separating the hammers. You don't actually have to try to slow the typist down by mechanical means anyway, since that is self correcting (i.e. too many jams, just type slower).
|
Posted by: Quadraman on 2007-05-12 05:35:37
I think it'd be too much re-adjustment for me to learn the Dvorak layout. Same - I can't touch-type, but you do still feel your fingers moving towards the location of the keys you need without having to think about it. I don't think I could cope with trying to learn a new layout (plus you'd have to buy a special keyboard to even try it).
I don't touch type, either. I cheat. I use my memory as a buffer. I memorize two or three sentences, type them out, and then when I get near the end I glance back and take in 2 or 3 more sentences. The Amazing Human Print Spooler!!!
|
| 1 > |