68kMLA Classic Interface
This is a version of the 68kMLA forums for viewing on your favorite old mac. Visitors on modern platforms may prefer the main site.
| Click here to select a new forum. | | Forgot how nice it was to use Filemaker 8.5 and 5.0 on older macs | Posted by: FacnyFreddy on 2017-01-25 09:20:35
Not the fastest platform for doing HUGE csv imports into a table, but, I got it working after digging out my old copy of FMP 8.5 and 5.0 [i do NOT recommend running FMP 8 or 9 on a G3 under 400MHz and less than 512MB of RAM]
One thing that was weird, when I loaded FMP 8.5 onto my XP VM, I was dealing with a corrupted PEM for root and server. I had to copy the PEM files over from my G3 Pismo (after a fresh install on Tiger) to get it to "see" the network instances.
When last I used FMP 8 (or 9 for that matter) was when we had a G4 mac mini as our "team" server running FM Server 9 on Tiger. We switched over to a FM Server "Advanced" on a Mac Pro running Leopard on a dual-G5 and 4GB of RAM. It was like nigh-n-day difference in performance and web apps we ran seemed to just scream along. When we got the 8-core Mac Pro with 8GB into production with FM Server 9 (or 10?), and big-fast 7200 RPM drives in a RAID-10 setup, we had more people using FM apps than Oracle Apps.
IT had a snit-fit because they had to setup user accounts on both systems and didn't like having a pair of "towers" taking up precious space in their APC racks. The G5 for dev and the 2006 Pro for Production.
A bit of fond memories from those days...
| Posted by: beachycove on 2017-02-03 18:39:17
Fabulous software, over the years, though using it to the full hasn't been a job for ordinary mortals for quite a few iterations. My level of competence peaks somewhere in the FileMaker 3-5 era!
| Posted by: Cory5412 on 2017-02-04 10:49:51
I like FileMaker a lot, have always felt like I was under-using it. Even in the FileMaker/Pro 2 era where they for black-and-white compact Macs.
Regarding IT: When was that? If recently, I'm surprised they didn't just draft an MOU to charge your department per rack-unit of space available amp of power and network connections, and then have their fit about running a G5 and an '06MP, complete with versions of OS X and a networked server app that aren't getting patches any more.
| Posted by: FacnyFreddy on 2017-03-06 18:40:38
This was "a ways back" and the golems who ran the datacenter were as anti-mac as you can expect.
We had Leopard with a couple of custom patches on the 06 doing laps around the $500K Sparc servers with the Xeon quad core setups. Putting the web services on a different box than the DB also made it alot more scalable.
But the G5 systems certainly held their own for quite some time. Just could not get more than 2 cpu boxes by the time the x86 switch took place.
The G4DP MDD systems were not quite fast enough after we went production... And so the budget for a pair of G5s were considered "reasonable". IT still wanted us to use Sparc servers with 16GB and 12 core boxes at nearly 10x the cost. Our Sun sales rep was a turd. The Oracle rep was no better.
The Apple/Filemaker team stepped up when ever we asked for help and even pitched in with our preso.
I think our largest DB (single dataset) was over 900GB and by that time we switched to Oracle for all the repositories and left only the fact tables in local (non-ODBC) data stores.
| | 1 |
|