68kMLA Classic Interface

This is a version of the 68kMLA forums for viewing on your favorite old mac. Visitors on modern platforms may prefer the main site.

Click here to select a new forum.
Running miniVMac on macOS Sequoia
Posted by: Snial on 2024-11-13 11:39:42
Now that I've upgraded my MacBook Air M2 to macOS Sequoia, just for the login screen you understand ;-) I wanted to run the native version Mini vMac, but Apple have made it harder to run unsigned apps. You can circumvent it by first trying to run the app; then hitting (Cancel) then going into terminal and typing:

xattr -d com.apple.quarantine /path/to/app

It's easier mostly just to drag the app from the Finder window to the command line to get the full path. In my case:

xattr -d com.apple.quarantine /Applications/Emulators/MiniVMac/Mini\ vMac.app

I didn't work it out myself, I got it from here:

https://www.howtogeek.com/803598/app-is-damaged-and-cant-be-opened/
Posted by: killvore on 2024-11-19 05:29:35
Thank you! I really don't like this trend in macOS and wish there was a general "I know what I'm doing"-setting, but at least there are (increasingly tedious) workarounds
Posted by: CC_333 on 2024-11-26 09:53:55
Can't any of this stuff be disabled system wide?

I know that Gatekeeper could be more or less in older versions of MacOS. Is that still true?

c
Posted by: Snial on 2024-11-26 11:12:33
Can't any of this stuff be disabled system wide?
it might be possible, but I didn't want a blanket approach, because you could always use the method for every unsigned app you have even if it's laborious; whereas a blanket approach might not suit some members - because they might be concerned about future, dodgy apps they accidentally installed.
Posted by: LaPorta on 2024-11-26 11:56:17
Cant you just right-click on it, select open, and then it will ask you if you are sure that you want to open it?
Posted by: treellama on 2024-11-26 12:13:24
Not as of macOS Sequoia, no
Posted by: LaPorta on 2024-11-26 12:23:58
Not as of macOS Sequoia, no
What a load of balls that is...
Posted by: CC_333 on 2024-11-26 16:40:03
What a load of balls that is...
Apparently they finally patched that loophole....

c
1