68kMLA Classic Interface
This is a version of the 68kMLA forums for viewing on your favorite old mac. Visitors on modern platforms may prefer the main site.
| Click here to select a new forum. | |
| Performance: AsanteFAST versus Farallon EtherFast? | |
So, it's been benchmarked here before that the AsanteFAST 10/100 Ethernet card...just isn't too fast. Unsurprisingly older OT just can't push very quick anyway, and so the returns are really diminished.68K/early PPC with onboard AAUI 100mbps ethernet?I learned a lot from this thread, but it looks like nobody ever posted test results... I have some here for those still curious: Test file: Mac OS 9.2.1 Update.smi (84.4MB / 86,018,641 bytes) Switch: TrendNET TEG-S24g Gigabit Server: Power Macintosh 9600/1000(G4 [2MB Cache on board]) Apple...
68kmla.org
Curiously though, looking at photos on Bitsavers, I realized there's a difference between that card and the Farallon "EtherFast": The AsanteFAST uses an SMSC LAN91C100, while the Farallon uses a LAN91C100FD. What's that mean? The LAN91C100FD properly supports full duplex transfers. Note that I'm not sure the Farallon is really an "EtherFast" at all...perhaps this was a Fast EtherTX 10/100? Farallon has it pegged at 20MBps "bus performance" which is kinda corny...guess they didn't even support NuBus 90!: https://web.archive.org/web/19980524081443/http://www.farallon.com/product/fen/fecards.html Has anyone ever compared the two? I wonder if the Farallon wins... Posted by: eharmon on 2024-09-24 00:09:38 | |
| How do they compare to Apple's A/ROSE ethernet adapter? Posted by: olePigeon on 2024-09-25 13:55:19 | |
| What is the maximum theoretical transfer speed of NuBus? The bus alone presents a huge bottleneck. Add in that these cards are likely polled I/O driven and not bus mastering DMA (read: Cheap) attached to an OS not exactly known for its I/O throughput. Posted by: NJRoadfan on 2024-09-25 14:58:41 | |
| If you can do 11MBs on a scuzzy Nubus card, you should be able to get more then 10Mb speed with a network Nubus card. Apples networking sucks in 68K and early PPC machines. I can get much faster transfers on a 486 with VLB or EISA 10Mb ethernet. Posted by: Unknown_K on 2024-09-25 15:17:05 | |
| I got a maximum of 866KiB/sec on a AsanteFAST 10/100 with a Rocket under System 6 for a download and 606KiB/sec upload. Agree with Unknown_K that the networking performance is mediocre, but still very easy to set up compared to NFS... Posted by: Mk.558 on 2024-09-25 18:01:16 | |
| Today I was doing some research and noticed in a picture the Farallon uses a full duplex chip and I was curious to learn more! So then I found my own thread here...oops. Anyway, they do share pinouts, so I suspect it's a drop in replacement: LAN91C100: https://datasheet4u.com/datasheet-pdf/SMSCCorporation/LAN91C100/pdf.php?id=582511 LAN91C100FD: https://rocelec.widen.net/view/pdf/logpzofyr8/SMSCS00288-1.pdf Application Note: https://static5.arrow.com/pdfs/2004/0512/semi_a/2/smsc/application note/an82.pdf So, theoretically it's a drop in replacement, except you need to activate full duplex mode by setting a bit (see page 23 of the FD datasheet - SWFDUP), so it won't have full duplex without modifying the ROM/driver. Probably does nothing for ethernet performance either -- it's clearly bottlenecked by the OS. And on a switched network, half duplex isn't slowing down your other devices. So overall, I'm still curious if the Farallon is faster (it may not set the duplex bit anyway), but I suspect modding a (rare) AsanteFAST doesn't have much value, unless the chip happens to be dead. Posted by: eharmon on 2025-10-13 22:40:00 |