| Click here to select a new forum. |
| SE/30 Xceed greyscale adapter cloning thread |
Posted by: pcamen on 2019-10-15 10:42:01
Starting this thread to discuss the possibility of creating cloned versions of the Xceed greyscale adapter for the SE/30.
I'd be willing to throw in some money to help get this off the ground. My interest would just be getting my capital back, if possible, not making any profit.
|
Posted by: pcamen on 2019-10-15 10:44:28
Bring in comments from the eBay Finds Thread
@Bolle said:
Micron Exceed schematics I think those are available on the net already. At least I got a copy flying around here somewhere I thought.
Also buzzed out my card for mostly complete schematics before I knew those were already out there.
(presumably) code for all the custom chips Make that one custom chip. If those documents really contained the hardware description of the main video controller that could easily be converted to some modern FPGA. The four GALs are very similar to the XCeed 306-48 judging from the signals that are present.
@maceffects said:
@pcamen I think the market is larger based on my experience. This is something more people would want than just a accelerator. I would suspect $250-$350 is appropriate. With a market size of around 200-250 (sold within a 1 year period).
If you are serious about this, there is a place that makes the rear video adapter and harness. I suspect this would be a good project. Unfortunately, given the various projects I’m involved with the savings is running low on my end. But I’d be happy to facilitate this. I have tons of contacts in China and have basic Mandarin skills.
|
Posted by: jessenator on 2019-10-15 11:28:31
I'd be interested as well.
Wasn't there a development thread for this? Not that a renewed spark of interest would hurt anything 🙂
Is this something the spearheader would want to be kept under their supervision (funding) or something to take to a crowdsourcing medium?
I wonder, too, if this could be a BYOadapter situation. There are kits for the yoke already at least. Personally, I'm not too interested in an external monitor connection, but I might be in the minority.
|
Posted by: pcamen on 2019-10-15 11:38:24
I'd love an external monitor connection that could do more than 640x480, in addition to the internal greyscale.
|
Posted by: Trash80toHP_Mini on 2019-10-15 11:38:33
That was quick! :approve: Cloning only the internal grayscale portion ought to hit the spot for the vast majority of prospective customers I would think. One piece at a time?
/Johnny Cash
|
Posted by: joshc on 2019-10-15 11:44:33
I'd be interested in this as a buyer of it. I don't have many skills that would help with the creation of it I'm afraid.
Ideally a single card that provides internal greyscale, external colour + Ethernet on a single card would be neat, but I'm sure that would add a lot of complexity to this project.
|
Posted by: EvilCapitalist on 2019-10-15 11:48:13
As I mentioned over in the eBay thread, the biggest impediment to getting a project like this off the ground is the inevitable project creep. There was a discussion about creating an accelerator for the SE/30 that ultimately went nowhere, and I'd wager that a major part of that was because it was too ambitious a project:
|
Posted by: pcamen on 2019-10-15 11:51:11
Agreed to the project creep comment. Cloning the existing one verbatim would be a great start.
|
Posted by: maceffects on 2019-10-15 13:09:15
I think we should design a card that has WiFi, processor upgrade, and video all in one! Just kidding, though I wish it was possible. Scope creep should be my middle name. But realistically, if we find an electrical engineer who is also familar with Macs I think we can do this. I know I can have a board sent to a place I know in China for reasonable reverse engineering including some of the chips. But, it would result in the card sent being a sacrificial lamb.
|
Posted by: jessenator on 2019-10-15 13:17:56
I know I can have a board sent to a place I know in China for reasonable reverse engineering including some of the chips. But, it would result in the card sent being a sacrificial lamb. Maybe not feasible (too bleeding edge?), but I heard on GamersNexus HW recap about this: https://www.electronicsweekly.com/news/business/non-destructive-way-2019-10/
non-destructive means is interesting.
I for one, am perfectly content for "recreate the Color 30" straightforward approach. No creep 🙂
|
Posted by: Trash80toHP_Mini on 2019-10-15 13:18:46
I think we should design a card that has WiFi, processor upgrade, and video all in one! Just kidding, though I wish it was possible. That's not really impossible, but move the WiFi to a 10bT dongle and forget about Video Out, that one is definitely feature creep IMO. [}🙂]
|
Posted by: ktkm on 2019-10-17 12:20:13
I'd love an external monitor connection that could do more than 640x480, in addition to the internal greyscale. Yes! And accelerated graphics would be great! I would back an SE/30 Xceed greyscale adapter cloning project. 🙂
|
Posted by: Jinnai on 2019-10-17 12:34:55
That's not really impossible, but move the WiFi to a 10bT dongle and forget about Video Out, that one is definitely feature creep IMO. [}🙂] Doesn't the original card have external video? I'd absolutely pay for a device that simply gave grayscale ability to the SE/30, but if the original had color video out then I'm not sure it's feature creep. I think grayscale is the most important though, if we could just do that it'd be nice.
|
Posted by: EvilCapitalist on 2019-10-17 13:41:44
It does, but grayscale on the internal monitor is disabled if you connect an external monitor. It sounds like folks were asking for the ability to drive both internal grayscale and an external monitor at the same time.
|
Posted by: Jinnai on 2019-10-17 13:47:51
Oh, I see. Considering the SE is portable, I imagine duplicating the video it has would be more useful than giving it new, more varied video output abilities for the purpose of tying it down to a second monitor. And as far as I know a way already exists for duplicating the internal video, so it's a comparatively short hop.
|
Posted by: Trash80toHP_Mini on 2019-10-17 16:02:56
SE/30 PDS has three interrupt lines, so could support an internal grayscale only video card, an external output video card and a network card. The limitation is that the PDS is is only (capable?) spec'd for driving two TTL inputs as opposed to the three needed for such a combination which would be further complicated by acceleration.
A baseline graycsale card for internal monitor support only would be the first step as I see it. Output to drive an external display in color would be the second step, whether done in the XCEED A/B switch method with its limited 640x480 resolution or by implementing two nearly identical setups for driving both at the same time as an added feature.
XCEED card's external refresh rate is the sticking point as I see it. If it's not 60Hz, I'd go the second route after first developing the internal grayscale card. More and better pixels compatible with a modern panel would be the way to go. The wider 640p standard scales perfectly to 720p and the 1080p common denominator of current panels.
|
Posted by: CC_333 on 2019-10-17 16:25:10
We definitely need to control feature creep. That is what ends up making projects like this DOA, because the creator(s) end up trying to do too many things at once, and inevitably get overwhelmed.
I, for one, would hate to see that happen here, because I've wanted an Xceed for some time now, but the prices just keep going up, and my budget isn't getting any larger anytime soon, and it would be super neat if I could get a clone of one for a much more affordable price.
Keep it simple, and it will have a very good chance of getting somewhere!
c
|
Posted by: pcamen on 2019-10-17 16:44:36
Agreed, feature creep control is essential. I think an exact cloning of the current card would be a great first step.
|
Posted by: Trash80toHP_Mini on 2019-10-17 20:00:13
What I'm saying is feature creep would be anything more complex than getting a clone of just its internal grayscale function up and running. Anything aside from that singular basic function is feature creep. Sending any signal outside the box is a second step and is certainly is not the EXCEED card's strong suit. 680x480@8bit is pathetic, not really worth pursuing on its own IMO. If what's wanted is a "real" copy of that card, that would be another thing.
KISS, get the internal grayscale part done first and worry about the rest . . . if and when. :approve:
|
| 1 > |