68kMLA Classic Interface

This is a version of the 68kMLA forums for viewing on your favorite old mac. Visitors on modern platforms may prefer the main site.

Click here to select a new forum.
CF versus IDE HDD results
Posted by: Mk.558 on 2012-07-01 12:14:43
Dumped the IDE hard drive results this morning. CF was done a couple of weeks ago.

Graphical:

f0adbe90.jpg

Text version:

c211d5b5.png

CF worth it? Oh heck yeah. No sounds whatsoever. Feels weird now to have a spinning disk in there. Also, if something goes wrong, it's a dual slot adaptor, not like I can't put another card in there to get another bootable card for another application. Or if it runs into trouble, pull the card and put a new one in, but the Industrial variants have a MTBF of 1 million hours, so I figure I have a long ways to go. 🙂

Mac details: Oh yeah and I dumped MacBench 4.0 onto the hard drive, I wasn't about to run it off the network or CD.

f4eea9de.jpg

Originals: [1] [2] [3]

d8cc3446.jpg

6b42ace3.jpg
Posted by: Mk.558 on 2012-07-04 11:49:41
Anybody else doing this sort of thing?

Seems quite quiet now...
Posted by: Charlieman on 2012-07-04 12:34:52
The three tables at the top are interesting. For tiddly files (smaller than 128KB), the performance benefits on read access are modest, but these are the file sizes that are most common for Mac OS 7.6 Macs. Apart from the System file and Finder, how much in the System folder is bigger than 128KB? Does Mac OS 7.6 make a difference? -- block sizes would be smaller with HFS+. The 1MB file size performance improvements are pretty conclusive, however. If your data files are sound, video or graphics, CF will make your Mac snappier.

Without intending to sneer at a Duo 2300 (which I'd love to use), it isn't the model that will most benefit from CF in performance terms. I am tempted to put one into my PB 3400 (or rather, I'm happy to know that it is a realistic proposition when my hard disk dies).
Posted by: beachycove on 2012-07-04 13:23:29
My 2400c/180 was noticeably faster with a CF drive installed internally, and indeed, the results were more dramatic. It was not so good in the PCMCIA slot, however.
Posted by: Trash80toHP_Mini on 2012-07-04 14:16:12
Interesting about the differences in performance there. I wonder if it's the PCMCIA controller that's the bottleneck?
Posted by: Mk.558 on 2012-09-02 19:46:10
I nearly forgot about this, but...

The Duo's IDE connector has a blank pin, it is visible on the photo below. If you are upgrading to a CF solution (highly recommended) then you'll have to break off the pin. In this adaptor, I followed the pin and it was just a ground pin. As they say, "Mind your pin 1!" and it is certainly true. Make quadruply sure you are looking at it right.
1