| Click here to select a new forum. |
| haplain's never-ending quest |
Posted by: haplain on 2014-01-13 10:40:41
Yeah, I kind of wish they had come out with something like that. It would have been awful to keep clean and not scuff though.
I had a drive but it failed and I wasn't able to recover anything off of it sadly. My buddies seeing if he can dig out some disks for it. We will eventually get it sorted out, until then I'll continue my quest for more stuff!
|
Posted by: TheMacGuy on 2014-01-13 17:10:05
Sucks about the hard drive. It was completely toast?
|
Posted by: haplain on 2014-01-14 15:14:04
Yeah it was no good but I'll figure it out. It always makes it sweeter when I get it working after some serious stress. Thus far my track records good so I remain hopeful. Does anyone think that maybe trying to install 9.2.2 would help to get it working? I'd be okay running 9.2.2-10.5 if I knew which one would work. I haven't tried 10.5 yet.
|
Posted by: TheMacGuy on 2014-01-14 15:59:55
Well, the 5,8 that shipped didn't support a native boot of OS 9, so its safe to assume the PBG4DP Proto is the same.
|
Posted by: haplain on 2014-01-14 16:18:38
Maybe a 10.0 public beta or 10.0 standard would work
|
Posted by: Gorgonops on 2014-01-14 16:53:33
Maybe a 10.0 public beta or 10.0 standard would work Are you talking about this on the dual CPU prototype? I rather doubt it. If there's one consistent rule about Macs it's that they *never* boot OS releases older than themselves and if the dual CPU unit is really in the "5,8" family it probably won't boot anything less than 10.4.something. (Another possibility is the 5,8 designation was reused and simply means "successor to 5,7", but that would still make the oldest OS at all likely to run on it a late version of 10.3.) Are you booting it with a "Retail" 10.4 disk, and if so, does it attempt to install or does it complain the system is unsupported? I'd hazard that cloning a working 10.4 install from another machine is probably your best shot at making it go, but if that's not working, I dunno, maybe Leopard?
(I have to wonder if the 5,8 designation, since that applies to the shipped 1.67 high-def screen model, might be causing the system to load the wrong set of kernel modules for a dual CPU or some other hardware element. It might be interesting to try a PPC Linux disk on it and see what happens.)
|
Posted by: haplain on 2014-01-15 11:39:28
Ok well maybe I'll try 10.5 and see if that gets me anything.
Any chance I could somehow test/remove the 5,8 designation?
|
Posted by: TheMacGuy on 2014-01-15 12:49:21
It has to do with the OS. By the model identifier, it loads up the proper drivers. Since the 5,8 shipped without a DP, it can't load the proper drivers with a standard OS. Thats my guess.
|
Posted by: haplain on 2014-01-18 11:47:57
I FINALLY GOT ONE!!!! I was super excited to see this pop up. Now I just need a frame.
|
Posted by: TheMacGuy on 2014-01-18 12:24:13
Is that going to hand above the NeXTCube? Nice nab!
|
Posted by: haplain on 2014-01-19 13:07:56
Maybe. I might put it in my back shed that's where I have all my tools etc.
|
Posted by: uniserver on 2014-01-19 14:56:12
maybe you could frame it.. and your GF will let you have it in the living room…
or maybe you can put it on the ceiling in your bed room 🙂
LOL
|
Posted by: haplain on 2014-01-19 17:32:25
Just grabbed this
|
Posted by: unity on 2014-01-19 17:53:14
Not bad! Especially considering it was originally listed at $4k (maybe more)!
|
Posted by: haplain on 2014-01-19 17:58:05
6500 is where it started. Didn't pay that and will maybe use it for a trade.
|
Posted by: unity on 2014-01-19 18:04:19
6500 is where it started. Didn't pay that and will maybe use it for a trade. Okay, I thought it was more but the auction I found was $4k. Crazy. No matter the start price, I think you made out really well on that one!
|
Posted by: haplain on 2014-01-19 18:06:53
Thanks. I continue my conquest for the clear Portable.
|
Posted by: CC_333 on 2014-01-19 19:41:35
If I'm not mistaken, that looks like a MacBook Pro of some sort with a DVT prototype wireless card.
Based on the limited evidence, it appears to be otherwise production or very late pre-production, unless you all know something I don't?
c
|
Posted by: haplain on 2014-01-20 10:41:04
Yeah it's some kind of late stage DVT model. I'd assume the wireless chip was what was being evaluated. Also the fact the board is not the standard logic board color for that machine is another indication it's not a production model. Lastly the EMC number being XXXX means it was a test unit. Overall I'm happy with the purchase and think it was worthwhile. It's hard to find newer DVT units like this. After the iPhone 4 was "lost" Apple really got crazy about everything. This was the model before that loss but one I doubt we see many prototype things from 2010 on.
|
Posted by: uniserver on 2014-01-20 10:58:18
you must get a clear portable ! 🙂
|
| < 10 > |